↓ Skip to main content

Candida bloodstream infection under veno-arterial ECMO therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Candida bloodstream infection under veno-arterial ECMO therapy
Published in
Critical Care, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2593-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quentin de Roux, Françoise Botterel, Raphaël Lepeule, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Olivier Langeron, Nicolas Mongardon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,866,395
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,838
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,133
of 352,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#41
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.