You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Choice of antipsychotic treatment by European psychiatry trainees: are decisions based on evidence?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-12-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sameer Jauhar, Sinan Guloksuz, Olivier Andlauer, Greg Lydall, João Gama Marques, Luis Mendonca, Iolanda Dumitrescu, Costin Roventa, Nele De Vriendt, Jeroen Van Zanten, Florian Riese, Izu Nwachukwu, Alexander Nawka, Raphael Psaras, Neil Masson, Rajeev Krishnadas, Umberto Volpe, European Federation of Psychiatric Trainees' Research Group |
| Abstract |
Little is known about the factors influencing treatment choice in psychosis, the majority of this work being conducted with specialists (consultant) in psychiatry. We sought to examine trainees' choices of treatment for psychosis if they had to prescribe it for themselves, their patients, and factors influencing decision-making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Egypt | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 35% |
| Psychology | 20 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,378,960
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#920
of 5,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,732
of 173,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.