↓ Skip to main content

A proposed staging system for chronic symptomatic pilonidal sinus disease and results in patients treated with stage-based approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A proposed staging system for chronic symptomatic pilonidal sinus disease and results in patients treated with stage-based approach
Published in
BMC Surgery, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12893-016-0134-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Guner, Arif B. Cekic, Aydin Boz, Serdar Turkyilmaz, Uzer Kucuktulu

Abstract

Although there are many therapeutic options to manage patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease, there remains controversy over a gold standard method for treating such patients. Most studies regarding sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus, collected patients in a single pool, and single modality was performed to all patients so far. Staging according to the progressive nature of disease and comparisons of stage-based treatment approaches are yet to be conducted. This study aimed to define a staging system and to evaluate outcomes with the use of stage-based treatment approach. The collected data of patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease prior to June 2011 were analyzed. Following this analysis, a staging system was defined based on morphological extent of disease (stage I to stage IV for primary disease, and stage R for recurrent disease). Specific surgical technique was used for each stage. Between June 2011 and December 2014, 367 patients were operated based on proposed staging system and treatment algorithm. Demographics, perioperative data, short-term and long-term outcomes were evaluated according to the disease stage. For all patients, the median length of hospital stay was 1 (range, 0-4) day. Primary healing without any wound complications was achieved in 320 (87.2 %) patients. The median time to functional recovery was 10 (range, 2-35) days and for wound healing was 12 (range, 10-55) days. Disease recurrence was identified in six (1.6 %) patients within the median follow-up period of 29 (range, 5-47) months. The outcomes of each stage were evaluated separately. We believe that the proposed staging system and stage-based treatment approach, which need further validation, will have an efficacy in the treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease and will contribute to the development of more appropriate individualized management approaches. Moreover, the use of this staging system will likely facilitate sharing and comparing more specific clinical data from future studies. NCT02712970 (ClinicalTrials.gov/09.03.2016).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Unknown 21 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2020.
All research outputs
#14,845,697
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#320
of 1,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,880
of 269,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.