↓ Skip to main content

Host-pathogen interactome mapping for HTLV-1 and -2 retroviruses

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Host-pathogen interactome mapping for HTLV-1 and -2 retroviruses
Published in
Retrovirology, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-9-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Simonis, Jean-François Rual, Irma Lemmens, Mathieu Boxus, Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa, Jean-Stéphane Gatot, Amélie Dricot, Tong Hao, Didier Vertommen, Sébastien Legros, Sarah Daakour, Niels Klitgord, Maud Martin, Jean-François Willaert, Franck Dequiedt, Vincent Navratil, Michael E Cusick, Arsène Burny, Carine Van Lint, David E Hill, Jan Tavernier, Richard Kettmann, Marc Vidal, Jean-Claude Twizere

Abstract

Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and type 2 both target T lymphocytes, yet induce radically different phenotypic outcomes. HTLV-1 is a causative agent of Adult T-cell leukemia (ATL), whereas HTLV-2, highly similar to HTLV-1, causes no known overt disease. HTLV gene products are engaged in a dynamic struggle of activating and antagonistic interactions with host cells. Investigations focused on one or a few genes have identified several human factors interacting with HTLV viral proteins. Most of the available interaction data concern the highly investigated HTLV-1 Tax protein. Identifying shared and distinct host-pathogen protein interaction profiles for these two viruses would enlighten how they exploit distinctive or common strategies to subvert cellular pathways toward disease progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,416,635
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#257
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,457
of 160,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them