You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation of diagnostic accuracy using digital slides in routine histopathology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-1596-7-35 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
László Fónyad, Tibor Krenács, Péter Nagy, Attila Zalatnai, Judit Csomor, Zoltán Sápi, Judit Pápay, Júlia Schönléber, Csaba Diczházi, Béla Molnár |
Abstract |
Robust hardware and software tools have been developed in digital microscopy during the past years for pathologists. Reports have been advocated the reliability of digital slides in routine diagnostics. We have designed a retrospective, comparative study to evaluate the scanning properties and digital slide based diagnostic accuracy. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 18% |
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 25% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 35% |
Computer Science | 7 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2013.
All research outputs
#23,010,126
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#1,008
of 1,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,852
of 173,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.