↓ Skip to main content

Moving towards effective therapeutic strategies for Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moving towards effective therapeutic strategies for Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13023-016-0414-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan D. Geraets, Seung yon Koh, Michelle L. Hastings, Tammy Kielian, David A. Pearce, Jill M. Weimer

Abstract

The Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinoses (NCLs) are a family of autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorders that annually affect 1:100,000 live births worldwide. This family of diseases results from mutations in one of 14 different genes that share common clinical and pathological etiologies. Clinically, the diseases are subcategorized into infantile, late-infantile, juvenile and adult forms based on their age of onset. Though the disease phenotypes may vary in their age and order of presentation, all typically include progressive visual deterioration and blindness, cognitive impairment, motor deficits and seizures. Pathological hallmarks of NCLs include the accumulation of storage material or ceroid in the lysosome, progressive neuronal degeneration and massive glial activation. Advances have been made in genetic diagnosis and counseling for families. However, comprehensive treatment programs that delay or halt disease progression have been elusive. Current disease management is primarily targeted at controlling the symptoms rather than "curing" the disease. Recognizing the growing need for transparency and synergistic efforts to move the field forward, this review will provide an overview of the therapeutic approaches currently being pursued in preclinical and clinical trials to treat different forms of NCL as well as provide insight to novel therapeutic approaches in development for the NCLs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Researcher 20 13%
Other 12 8%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Neuroscience 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,516,215
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#329
of 2,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,106
of 274,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.