↓ Skip to main content

Reticulate evolution in stick insects: the case of Clonopsis (Insecta Phasmida)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reticulate evolution in stick insects: the case of Clonopsis (Insecta Phasmida)
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liliana Milani, Fabrizio Ghiselli, Marco Pellecchia, Valerio Scali, Marco Passamonti

Abstract

Phasmids show noteworthy abilities to overcome species-specific reproductive isolation mechanisms, including hybridization, polyploidy, parthenogenesis, hybridogenesis and androgenesis. From an evolutionary standpoint, such tangled reproductive interactions lead to the complex phyletic relationships known as "reticulate evolution". Moroccan stick insects of the genus Clonopsis include one bisexual (C. felicitatis) and two closely related parthenogenetic forms (C. gallica, C. soumiae), which represent a polyploid series in chromosome number, but with apparent diploid karyotypes. Moreover, two Clonopsis strains of ameiotic males have been described, C. androgenes-35 and C. androgenes-53. As a consequence, Clonopsis stick insects may have experienced complex micro-evolutionary events, which we try to disentangle in this study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
United Kingdom 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 39 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 4 9%