You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The foodscape: classification and field validation of secondary data sources across urban/rural and socio-economic classifications in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-9-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amelia A Lake, Thomas Burgoine, Elaine Stamp, Rachael Grieve |
| Abstract |
In recent years, alongside the exponential increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity, there has been a change in the food environment (foodscape). This research focuses on methods used to measure and classify the foodscape. This paper describes the foodscape across urban/rural and socio-economic divides. It examines the validity of a database of food outlets obtained from Local Authority sources (secondary level & desk based), across urban/rural and socio-economic divides by conducting fieldwork (ground-truthing). Additionally this paper tests the efficacy of using a desk based classification system to describe food outlets, compared with ground-truthing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 21% |
| Researcher | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 36 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2012.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#2,016
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,014
of 173,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#33
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.