↓ Skip to main content

Incidence and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
518 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in Uganda
Published in
Reproductive Health, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12978-016-0154-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Ononge, Florence Mirembe, Julius Wandabwa, Oona M. R. Campbell

Abstract

Globally, postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading cause of maternal deaths. However in many low and middle income countries, there is scarcity of information on magnitude of and risk factors for PPH (blood loss of 500 ml or more). It is important to understand the relative contributions of different risk factors for PPH. We assessed the incidence of, and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage among rural women in Uganda. Between March 2013 and March 2014, a prospective cohort study was conducted at six health facilities in Uganda. Women were administered a questionnaire to ascertain risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage, defined as a blood loss of 500 mls or more, and assessed using a calibrated under-buttocks drape at childbirth. We constructed two separate multivariable logistic regression models for the variables associated with PPH. Model 1 included all deliveries (vaginal and cesarean sections). Model 2 analysis was restricted to vaginal deliveries. In both models, we adjusted for clustering at facility level. Among the 1188 women, the overall incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was 9.0 %, (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 7.5-10.6 %) and of severe postpartum hemorrhage (1000 mls or more) was 1.2 %, (95 % CI 0.6-2.0 %). Most (1157 [97.4 %]) women received a uterotonic after childbirth for postpartum hemorrhage prophylaxis. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage among all deliveries (model 1) were: cesarean section delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.54; 95 % CI 4.11-13.81); multiple pregnancy (aOR 2.26; 95 % CI 0.58-8.79); foetal macrosomia ≥4000 g (aOR 2.18; 95 % CI 1.11-4.29); and HIV positive sero-status (aOR 1.93; 95 % CI 1.06-3.50). Risk factors among vaginal deliveries only, were similar in direction and magnitude as in model 1, namely: multiple pregnancy, (aOR 7.66; 95 % CI 1.81-32.34); macrosomia, (aOR 2.14; 95 % CI1.02-4.47); and HIV positive sero-status (aOR 2.26; 95 % CI 1.20-4.25). The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was high in our setting despite use of uterotonics. The risk factors identified could be addressed by extra vigilance during labour and preparedness for PPH management in all women giving birth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 518 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 518 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 16%
Student > Bachelor 68 13%
Student > Postgraduate 40 8%
Researcher 27 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 4%
Other 71 14%
Unknown 208 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 166 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 12%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Other 47 9%
Unknown 216 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,986,112
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#189
of 1,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,947
of 316,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.