You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of land use regression models for nitrogen dioxide, ultrafine particles, lung deposited surface area, and four other markers of particulate matter pollution in the Swiss SAPALDIA regions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12940-016-0137-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marloes Eeftens, Reto Meier, Christian Schindler, Inmaculada Aguilera, Harish Phuleria, Alex Ineichen, Mark Davey, Regina Ducret-Stich, Dirk Keidel, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Nino Künzli, Ming-Yi Tsai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 20% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 32 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Engineering | 10 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,563,090
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#1,115
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,874
of 315,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#27
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.