↓ Skip to main content

Validation of activity questionnaires in patients with cystic fibrosis by accelerometry and cycle ergometry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of activity questionnaires in patients with cystic fibrosis by accelerometry and cycle ergometry
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina C Ruf, Sonja Fehn, Michèle Bachmann, Alexander Moeller, Kristina Roth, Susi Kriemler, Helge Hebestreit

Abstract

The objective of this study was to validate physical activity questionnaires for cystic fibrosis (CF) against accelerometry and cycle ergometry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Sports and Recreations 9 12%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 32 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,156,199
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,863
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,893
of 161,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#36
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.