You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
MRSA model of learning and adaptation: a qualitative study among the general public
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-88 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rodney E Rohde, Jovita Ross-Gordon |
Abstract |
More people in the US now die from Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections than from HIV/AIDS. Often acquired in healthcare facilities or during healthcare procedures, the extremely high incidence of MRSA infections and the dangerously low levels of literacy regarding antibiotic resistance in the general public are on a collision course. Traditional medical approaches to infection control and the conventional attitude healthcare practitioners adopt toward public education are no longer adequate to avoid this collision. This study helps us understand how people acquire and process new information and then adapt behaviours based on learning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
South Africa | 5 | 9% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 34 | 63% |
Scientists | 9 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Kenya | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 35% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#850,788
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#201
of 8,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,934
of 174,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.