↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of the ultrasound technique to measure the rectus femoris muscle diameter in older CAD-patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability and validity of the ultrasound technique to measure the rectus femoris muscle diameter in older CAD-patients
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-12-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Thomaes, Martine Thomis, Steven Onkelinx, Walter Coudyzer, Véronique Cornelissen, Luc Vanhees

Abstract

The increasing age of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients and the occurrence of sarcopenia in the elderly population accompanied by 'fear of moving' and hospitalization in these patients often results in a substantial loss of skeletal muscle mass and muscle strength. Cardiac rehabilitation can improve exercise tolerance and muscle strength in CAD patients but less data describe eventual morphological muscular changes possibly by more difficult access to imaging techniques. Therefore the aim of this study is to assess and quantify the reliability and validity of an easy applicable method, the ultrasound (US) technique, to measure the diameter of rectus femoris muscle in comparison to the muscle dimensions measured with CT scans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 207 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 48 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Sports and Recreations 18 8%
Engineering 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 63 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2012.
All research outputs
#14,725,504
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#213
of 588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,327
of 160,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.