↓ Skip to main content

Non-communicable diseases and global health governance: enhancing global processes to improve health development

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-communicable diseases and global health governance: enhancing global processes to improve health development
Published in
Globalization and Health, May 2007
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-3-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger S Magnusson

Abstract

This paper assesses progress in the development of a global framework for responding to non-communicable diseases, as reflected in the policies and initiatives of the World Health Organization (WHO), World Bank and the UN: the institutions most capable of shaping a coherent global policy. Responding to the global burden of chronic disease requires a strategic assessment of the global processes that are likely to be most effective in generating commitment to policy change at country level, and in influencing industry behaviour. WHO has adopted a legal process with tobacco (the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control), but a non-legal, advocacy-based approach with diet and physical activity (the Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health). The paper assesses the merits of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the FCTC as distinct global processes for advancing health development, before considering what lessons might be learned for enhancing the implementation of the Global Strategy on Diet. While global partnerships, economic incentives, and international legal instruments could each contribute to a more effective global response to chronic diseases, the paper makes a special case for the development of international legal standards in select areas of diet and nutrition, as a strategy for ensuring that the health of future generations does not become dependent on corporate charity and voluntary commitments. A broader frame of reference for lifestyle-related chronic diseases is needed: one that draws together WHO's work in tobacco, nutrition and physical activity, and that envisages selective use of international legal obligations, non-binding recommendations, advocacy and policy advice as tools of choice for promoting different elements of the strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 187 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 21%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 27%
Social Sciences 32 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 5%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 38 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,099,976
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#503
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,887
of 83,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.