↓ Skip to main content

“It’s my blood”: ethical complexities in the use, storage and export of biological samples: perspectives from South African research participants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 1,004)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“It’s my blood”: ethical complexities in the use, storage and export of biological samples: perspectives from South African research participants
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-15-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keymanthri Moodley, Nomathemba Sibanda, Kelsey February, Theresa Rossouw

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 40 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 22%
Social Sciences 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 48 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#581,167
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#30
of 1,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,608
of 307,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.