↓ Skip to main content

Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tosan Okoro, Rhiannon Whitaker, Andrew Gardner, Peter Maddison, John G. Andrew, Andrew Lemmey

Abstract

In-hospital progressive resistance training (PRT) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitation following hip surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether a home-based PRT program would be beneficial in improving patients' muscle strength and physical function compared to standard rehabilitation. Subjects (n = 49) either received home-based PRT rehabilitation (n = 25) or standard rehabilitation (n = 24) in a prospective single blinded randomized trial carried out over a two-year period. The primary outcome measure was the maximal voluntary contraction of the operated leg quadriceps (MVCOLQ) with secondary measures of outcome being the sit to stand score (ST), timed up and go (TUG), stair climb performance (SCP), the 6 min walk test (6MWT), and lean mass of the operated leg (LM). Twenty-six patients completed follow up at 1 year (n = 13 per group) for the final comparative analysis. All the outcome measures showed marked progressive improvements from the baseline measures at 9-12 months post op (Estimated effect (std error); p value)- MVCOLQ 26.50 (8.71) N p = 0.001; ST 1.37 (0.33) p = 0.0001; TUG -1.44 (0.45) s p =0.0001; SCP -3.41(0.80)s p = 0.0001; 6MWT 45.61 (6.10)m p = 0.0001; LM 20 (204)g p = 0.326) following surgery for both groups. Overall, there was no significant effect for participation in the exercise regime compared with standard care for all outcomes assessed. Overall, this study demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the two groups for participation in the home-based PRT exercise programme when compared to standard care for all outcomes. ISRCTN 1309951 . Registered February 2011.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 17%
Student > Master 34 15%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 92 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 15%
Sports and Recreations 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 107 46%