You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Testing the 2018 NIA-AA research framework in a retrospective large cohort of patients with cognitive impairment: from biological biomarkers to clinical syndromes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13195-019-0543-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tiziana Carandini, Andrea Arighi, Luca Sacchi, Giorgio G. Fumagalli, Anna M. Pietroboni, Laura Ghezzi, Annalisa Colombi, Marta Scarioni, Chiara Fenoglio, Milena A. De Riz, Giorgio Marotta, Elio Scarpini, Daniela Galimberti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,459,852
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#1,117
of 1,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,040
of 354,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#19
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.