↓ Skip to main content

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant compared with conventional chemotherapy for consolidation in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma—a randomized phase III trial (MATRix)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant compared with conventional chemotherapy for consolidation in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma—a randomized phase III trial (MATRix)
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2311-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth Schorb, Juergen Finke, Andrés J. M. Ferreri, Gabriele Ihorst, Kristina Mikesch, Benjamin Kasenda, Kristina Fritsch, Heidi Fricker, Elvira Burger, Olga Grishina, Elke Valk, Emanuele Zucca, Gerald Illerhaus

Abstract

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a highly aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with rising incidence over the past 30 years in immunocompetent patients. Although outcomes have improved, PCNSL is still associated with inferior prognosis compared to systemic NHL. Many questions regarding the optimal therapeutic approach remain unanswered. This is a randomized, open-label, international phase III trial with two parallel arms. We will recruit 250 patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL from approximately 35 centers within the networks of the German Cooperative PCNSL study group and the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group. All enrolled patients will undergo induction chemotherapy consisting of 4 cycles of rituximab 375 mg/m(2)/d (days 0 & 5), methotrexate 3.5 g/m(2) (d1), cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m(2)/d (d2-3), and thiotepa 30 mg/m(2) (d4) every 21 days. All patients will undergo stem-cell harvest after the second cycle. After 4 cycles of induction chemotherapy, patients achieving partial or complete response will be centrally randomized to 2 different consolidation treatments: (A) conventional-dose immuno chemotherapy with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) (d0), dexamethasone 40 mg/d (d1-3), etoposide 100 mg/m(2)/d (d1-3), ifosfamide 1500 mg/m(2)/d (d1-3) and carboplatin 300 mg/m(2) (d1) (R-DeVIC) or (B) high-dose chemotherapy with BCNU (or busulfan) and thiotepa followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT). The objective is to demonstrate superiority of HCT-ASCT compared to R-DeVIC with respect to progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), treatment response and treatment-related morbidities. Minimal follow-up after treatment completion is 24 months. The rationale for consolidation treatment in PCNSL is to eliminate residual lymphoma cells and to decrease the risk for relapse. This can be achieved by agents crossing the blood brain barrier either applied at conventional doses or at high doses requiring autologous stem cell support. HCT-ASCT has been shown to be feasible and highly effective in patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL. However, it is unclear whether HCT-ASCT is really superior compared to conventional-dose chemotherapy after an intensified antimetabolites-based immunochemotherapy in patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL. To answer this question, we designed this investigator initiated randomized phase III trial. German clinical trials registry DRKS00005503 registered 22 April 2014 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02531841 registered 24 August 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 21 16%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 31 24%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,479,767
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,068
of 8,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,196
of 299,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#34
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.