↓ Skip to main content

Vis Medicatrix naturae: does nature "minister to the mind"?

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 323)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vis Medicatrix naturae: does nature "minister to the mind"?
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1751-0759-6-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan C Logan, Eva M Selhub

Abstract

The healing power of nature, vis medicatrix naturae, has traditionally been defined as an internal healing response designed to restore health. Almost a century ago, famed biologist Sir John Arthur Thomson provided an additional interpretation of the word nature within the context of vis medicatrix, defining it instead as the natural, non-built external environment. He maintained that the healing power of nature is also that associated with mindful contact with the animate and inanimate natural portions of the outdoor environment. A century on, excessive screen-based media consumption, so-called screen time, may be a driving force in masking awareness of the potential benefits of nature. With global environmental concerns, rapid urban expansion, and mental health disorders at crisis levels, diminished nature contact may not be without consequence to the health of the individual and the planet itself. In the context of emerging research, we will re-examine Sir J. Arthur Thomson's contention that the healing power of the nature-based environment - green space, forests and parks in particular - extends into the realm of mental health and vitality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 208 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 20%
Student > Master 32 15%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 50 23%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Social Sciences 23 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 41 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#887,080
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#16
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,216
of 173,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.