You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chaotic dynamics as a possible mechanism of rapid change of hippocampal local field activity between theta rhythm and large irregular activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-13-s1-p189 |
| Authors |
Keita Tokuda, Yuichi Katori, Kazuyuki Aihara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
| Psychology | 1 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,598,062
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#376
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,188
of 164,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.