You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic review of the impact of nutrition claims related to fat, sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7622-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura H. Oostenbach, Esther Slits, Ella Robinson, Gary Sacks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
Chile | 1 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
Researcher | 17 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 13% |
Unknown | 85 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Other | 37 | 18% |
Unknown | 95 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,490,723
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,712
of 17,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,046
of 369,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#39
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.