You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Platelet-derived exosomes from septic shock patients induce myocardial dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc6176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Mariano Janiszewski, Vera Pontieri, Marcelo de Almeida Pedro, Estevão Bassi, Paulo José Ferreira Tucci, Francisco Rafael Martins Laurindo |
| Abstract |
Mechanisms underlying inotropic failure in septic shock are incompletely understood. We previously identified the presence of exosomes in the plasma of septic shock patients. These exosomes are released mainly by platelets, produce superoxide, and induce apoptosis in vascular cells by a redox-dependent pathway. We hypothesized that circulating platelet-derived exosomes could contribute to inotropic dysfunction of sepsis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,583,518
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,769
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,793
of 90,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.