↓ Skip to main content

Aberrant repair and fibrosis development in skeletal muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Muscle, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
626 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
762 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aberrant repair and fibrosis development in skeletal muscle
Published in
Skeletal Muscle, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/2044-5040-1-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Mann, Eusebio Perdiguero, Yacine Kharraz, Susana Aguilar, Patrizia Pessina, Antonio L Serrano, Pura Muñoz-Cánoves

Abstract

The repair process of damaged tissue involves the coordinated activities of several cell types in response to local and systemic signals. Following acute tissue injury, infiltrating inflammatory cells and resident stem cells orchestrate their activities to restore tissue homeostasis. However, during chronic tissue damage, such as in muscular dystrophies, the inflammatory-cell infiltration and fibroblast activation persists, while the reparative capacity of stem cells (satellite cells) is attenuated. Abnormal dystrophic muscle repair and its end stage, fibrosis, represent the final common pathway of virtually all chronic neurodegenerative muscular diseases. As our understanding of the pathogenesis of muscle fibrosis has progressed, it has become evident that the muscle provides a useful model for the regulation of tissue repair by the local microenvironment, showing interplay among muscle-specific stem cells, inflammatory cells, fibroblasts and extracellular matrix components of the mammalian wound-healing response. This article reviews the emerging findings of the mechanisms that underlie normal versus aberrant muscle-tissue repair.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 762 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 741 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 173 23%
Researcher 101 13%
Student > Master 96 13%
Student > Bachelor 75 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 7%
Other 126 17%
Unknown 139 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 191 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 144 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 96 13%
Engineering 47 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 2%
Other 90 12%
Unknown 177 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,893,404
of 24,404,997 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#96
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,351
of 113,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,404,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them