↓ Skip to main content

Changes of collective orientation through a medical student’s anaesthesia simulation course – simulation-based training study with non-technical skills debriefing versus medical debriefing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes of collective orientation through a medical student’s anaesthesia simulation course – simulation-based training study with non-technical skills debriefing versus medical debriefing
Published in
BMC Medical Education, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1765-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hendrik Eismann, Thomas Palmaers, Svetlozar Tsvetanov, Vera Hagemann, Markus Flentje

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 54 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 57 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,304,077
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,623
of 3,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,165
of 340,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#47
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.