You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potential application of serological tests on fluids from carcasses: detection of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii and Sarcoptes scabiei in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1751-0147-54-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva-Britt Jakubek, Roland Mattsson, Torsten Mörner, Jens G Mattsson, Dolores Gavier-Widén |
| Abstract |
Serological surveys for disease investigation of wild animal populations require obtaining blood samples for analysis, which has logistic, ethic and economic difficulties. Applying serological test to fluids collected from dead animals is an alternative. The aim of this study was to assess if antibodies could be detected in two types of fluids collected from 56 carcasses of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes): pleural fluid and lung extract. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 119 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 15 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#16,045,990
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#375
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,766
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.