You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The power of peers: an effectiveness evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-019-0820-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Poshan Thapa, Alex Harsha Bangura, Isha Nirola, David Citrin, Bishal Belbase, Bhawana Bogati, B. K. Nirmala, Sonu Khadka, Lal Kunwar, Scott Halliday, Nandini Choudhury, Al Ozonoff, Jasmine Tenpa, Ryan Schwarz, Mukesh Adhikari, S. P. Kalaunee, Sharon Rising, Duncan Maru, Sheela Maru |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 335 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 13% |
| Researcher | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Unknown | 155 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 11% |
| Unknown | 165 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,694,159
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,240
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,997
of 358,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.