You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A four-stage process for intervention description and guide development of a practice-based intervention: refining the Namaste Care intervention implementation specification for people with advanced dementia prior to a feasibility cluster randomised trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12877-019-1275-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine Walshe, Julie Kinley, Shakil Patel, Claire Goodman, Frances Bunn, Jennifer Lynch, David Scott, Anne Davidson Lund, Min Stacpoole, Nancy Preston, Katherine Froggatt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 52% |
South Africa | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Timor-Leste | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
Scientists | 8 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
Researcher | 12 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Other | 34 | 21% |
Unknown | 65 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 15% |
Arts and Humanities | 7 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
Other | 24 | 15% |
Unknown | 63 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,378,931
of 24,149,630 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#605
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,931
of 361,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#17
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,149,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.