You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7613-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Tugwell Jepsen, Pikka Jokelainen, Solveig Jore, Anders Boman, Daniel Slunge, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Professor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,031,417
of 23,973,927 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,596
of 15,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,319
of 361,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#125
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,973,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.