↓ Skip to main content

Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications (Correction)

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Procedures Online, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications (Correction)
Published in
Biological Procedures Online, October 2006
DOI 10.1251/bpo124
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. B. I. Reaz, M. S. Hussain, F. Mohd-Yasin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 23%
Student > Master 40 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 106 50%
Computer Science 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Unspecified 7 3%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 34 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#74
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,566
of 84,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them