You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Case study of a method of development of a selection process for community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa
Human Resources for Health, October 2019
Celia Brown, Richard Lilford, Frances Griffiths, Prince Oppong-Darko, Myness Ndambo, Marion Okoh-Owusu, Emily Wroe
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||83%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||17%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||4||8%|
|Student > Master||4||8%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||4||8%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||8||17%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||5||10%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||2%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 361,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.