↓ Skip to main content

Case study of a method of development of a selection process for community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case study of a method of development of a selection process for community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
Human Resources for Health, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12960-019-0412-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celia Brown, Richard Lilford, Frances Griffiths, Prince Oppong-Darko, Myness Ndambo, Marion Okoh-Owusu, Emily Wroe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Unspecified 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,901,084
of 15,055,070 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#660
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,479
of 322,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#81
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,055,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.