↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale SNP analysis reveals clustered and continuous patterns of human genetic variation

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genomics, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale SNP analysis reveals clustered and continuous patterns of human genetic variation
Published in
Human Genomics, June 2005
DOI 10.1186/1479-7364-2-2-81
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark D. Shriver, Rui Mei, Esteban J. Parra, Vibhor Sonpar, Indrani Halder, Sarah A. Tishkoff, Theodore G. Schurr, Sergev I. Zhadanov, Ludmila P. Osipova, Tom D. Brutsaert, Jonathan Friedlaender, Lynn B. Jorde, W. Scott Watkins, Michael J. Bamshad, Gerardo Gutierrez, Halina Loi, Hajime Matsuzaki, Rick A. Kittles, George Argyropoulos, Jose R. Fernandez, Joshua M. Akey, Keith W. Jones

Abstract

Understanding the distribution of human genetic variation is an important foundation for research into the genetics of common diseases. Some of the alleles that modify common disease risk are themselves likely to be common and, thus, amenable to identification using gene-association methods. A problem with this approach is that the large sample sizes required for sufficient statistical power to detect alleles with moderate effect make gene-association studies susceptible to false-positive findings as the result of population stratification. Such type I errors can be eliminated by using either family-based association tests or methods that sufficiently adjust for population stratification. These methods require the availability of genetic markers that can detect and, thus, control for sources of genetic stratification among populations. In an effort to investigate population stratification and identify appropriate marker panels, we have analysed 11,555 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 203 individuals from 12 diverse human populations. Individuals in each population cluster to the exclusion of individuals from other populations using two clustering methods. Higher-order branching and clustering of the populations are consistent with the geographic origins of populations and with previously published genetic analyses. These data provide a valuable resource for the definition of marker panels to detect and control for population stratification in population-based gene identification studies. Using three US resident populations (European-American, African-American and Puerto Rican), we demonstrate how such studies can proceed, quantifying proportional ancestry levels and detecting significant admixture structure in each of these populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Canada 2 2%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 110 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 14 11%
Professor 13 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,820,724
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Human Genomics
#160
of 567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,053
of 68,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genomics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.