You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When donor funding leaves: an interrupted time-series analysis of the impact of integrating direct HIV care and treatment into public health services in a region of Johannesburg
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-019-0192-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naomi Lince-Deroche, Rahma Leuner, Gesine Meyer-Rath, Yogan Pillay, Lawrence Long |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,534,060
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#308
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,464
of 361,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.