You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pilot randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention for diabetes self-management supported by volunteers, technology, and interprofessional primary health care teams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-019-0504-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gina Agarwal, Jessica Gaber, Julie Richardson, Dee Mangin, Jenny Ploeg, Ruta Valaitis, Graham J. Reid, Larkin Lamarche, Fiona Parascandalo, Dena Javadi, Daria O’Reilly, Lisa Dolovich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 57% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 80 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 93 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,630,783
of 23,427,600 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#146
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,726
of 363,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,427,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.