You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Role of nuclear factor-kappa B in feline injection site sarcoma
BMC Veterinary Research, October 2019
Cheng-Shun Hsueh, Ching-Ho Wu, Cheng-Hsin Shih, Jason Lih-Seng Yeh, Chian-Ren Jeng, Victor Fei Pang, Hue-Ying Chiou, Hui-Wen Chang
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||4||80%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||20%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||10%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||10||48%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||14%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||5%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
of 3,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 361,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.