↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Deep morphological analysis of muscle biopsies from type III glycogenesis (GSDIII), debranching enzyme deficiency, revealed stereotyped vacuolar myopathy and autophagy impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep morphological analysis of muscle biopsies from type III glycogenesis (GSDIII), debranching enzyme deficiency, revealed stereotyped vacuolar myopathy and autophagy impairment
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40478-019-0815-2
Pubmed ID
31661040
Authors

Pascal Laforêt, Michio Inoue, Evelyne Goillot, Claire Lefeuvre, Umut Cagin, Nathalie Streichenberger, Sarah Leonard-Louis, Guy Brochier, Angeline Madelaine, Clemence Labasse, Carola Hedberg-Oldfors, Thomas Krag, Louisa Jauze, Julien Fabregue, Philippe Labrune, Jose Milisenda, Aleksandra Nadaj-Pakleza, Sabrina Sacconi, Federico Mingozzi, Giuseppe Ronzitti, François Petit, Benedikt Schoser, Anders Oldfors, John Vissing, Norma B. Romero, Ichizo Nishino, Edoardo Malfatti

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Mathematics 2 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,102,013
of 16,148,319 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#406
of 958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,878
of 330,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#104
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,148,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.