↓ Skip to main content

Deep morphological analysis of muscle biopsies from type III glycogenesis (GSDIII), debranching enzyme deficiency, revealed stereotyped vacuolar myopathy and autophagy impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep morphological analysis of muscle biopsies from type III glycogenesis (GSDIII), debranching enzyme deficiency, revealed stereotyped vacuolar myopathy and autophagy impairment
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40478-019-0815-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal Laforêt, Michio Inoue, Evelyne Goillot, Claire Lefeuvre, Umut Cagin, Nathalie Streichenberger, Sarah Leonard-Louis, Guy Brochier, Angeline Madelaine, Clemence Labasse, Carola Hedberg-Oldfors, Thomas Krag, Louisa Jauze, Julien Fabregue, Philippe Labrune, Jose Milisenda, Aleksandra Nadaj-Pakleza, Sabrina Sacconi, Federico Mingozzi, Giuseppe Ronzitti, François Petit, Benedikt Schoser, Anders Oldfors, John Vissing, Norma B. Romero, Ichizo Nishino, Edoardo Malfatti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 20%
Student > Postgraduate 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Mathematics 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,223,399
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#665
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,996
of 362,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#38
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.