↓ Skip to main content

Anabolic steroids after total knee arthroplasty. A double blinded prospective pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anabolic steroids after total knee arthroplasty. A double blinded prospective pilot study
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1749-799x-5-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Hohmann, Kevin Tetsworth, Stefanie Hohmann, Adam L Bryant

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty is reported to improve the patient's quality of life and mobility. However loss of mobility and pain prior to surgery often results in disuse atrophy of muscle. As a consequence the baseline functional state prior to surgery may result in poorer outcome "post surgery" and extended rehabilitation may be required. The use of anabolic steroids for performance enhancement and to influence muscle mass is well established. The positive effects of such treatment on bone and muscle could therefore be beneficial in the rehabilitation of elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of small doses of Nandrolone decanoate on recovery and muscle strength after total knee replacement and to establish the safety of this drug in multimorbid patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 44%
Sports and Recreations 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#291
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,086
of 190,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them