You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Review: Sugar beets as a substitute for grain for lactating dairy cattle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40104-017-0154-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Essi Evans, Ulrike Messerschmidt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 35% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,370,994
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#70
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,216
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.