You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Utilization of antenatal ultrasound scan and implications for caesarean section: a cross-sectional study in rural Eastern China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-93 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kun Huang, Fangbiao Tao, Joanna Raven, Liu Liu, Xiaoyan Wu, Shenglan Tang |
| Abstract |
Antenatal ultrasound scan is a widely accepted component of antenatal care. Studies have looked at the relationship between ultrasound scanning and caesarean section (CS) in certain groups of women in China. However, there are limited data on the utilization of antenatal ultrasound scanning in the general population, including its association with CS. The purpose of this study is to describe the utilization of antenatal ultrasound screening in rural Eastern China and to explore the association between antenatal ultrasound scan and uptake of CS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2012.
All research outputs
#14,143,704
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,033
of 7,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,897
of 161,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#42
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.