↓ Skip to main content

Human iPSC banking: barriers and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human iPSC banking: barriers and opportunities
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12929-019-0578-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ching-Ying Huang, Chun-Lin Liu, Chien-Yu Ting, Yueh-Ting Chiu, Yu-Che Cheng, Martin W. Nicholson, Patrick C. H. Hsieh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 307 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 15%
Researcher 44 14%
Student > Master 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 89 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 27%
Neuroscience 23 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 99 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,617,803
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#154
of 1,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,567
of 356,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.