↓ Skip to main content

Human iPSC banking: barriers and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human iPSC banking: barriers and opportunities
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12929-019-0578-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ching-Ying Huang, Chun-Lin Liu, Chien-Yu Ting, Yueh-Ting Chiu, Yu-Che Cheng, Martin W. Nicholson, Patrick C. H. Hsieh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 284 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Master 31 11%
Other 11 4%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 73 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 83 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 8%
Neuroscience 20 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 5%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 80 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,959,280
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#105
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,312
of 361,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.