You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human iPSC banking: barriers and opportunities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-019-0578-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ching-Ying Huang, Chun-Lin Liu, Chien-Yu Ting, Yueh-Ting Chiu, Yu-Che Cheng, Martin W. Nicholson, Patrick C. H. Hsieh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 315 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 15% |
| Researcher | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 94 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 84 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 104 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,693,312
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#154
of 1,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,062
of 378,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.