You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Helsinki by nature: The Nature Step to Respiratory Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-019-0295-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tari Haahtela, Leena von Hertzen, Josep M Anto, Chunxue Bai, Abay Baigenzhin, Eric D Bateman, Digambar Behera, Kazi Bennoor, Paulo Camargos, Niels Chavannes, Jaime Correia de Sousa, Alvaro Cruz, Maria Do Céu Teixeira, Marina Erhola, Eeva Furman, Bilun Gemicioğlu, Sandra Gonzalez Diaz, Peter W Hellings, Pekka Jousilahti, Nikolai Khaltaev, Vitezslav Kolek, Piotr Kuna, Stefania La Grutta, Le Thi Tuyet Lan, Tamaz Maglakelidze, Mohamed R Masjedi, Florin Mihaltan, Yousser Mohammad, Elizabete Nunes, Arvid Nyberg, Jorge Quel, Jose Rosado-Pinto, Hironori Sagara, Boleslaw Samolinski, Dean Schraufnagel, Talant Sooronbaev, Mohamed Tag Eldin, Teresa To, Arunas Valiulis, Cherian Varghese, Tuula Vasankari, Giovanni Viegi, Tonya Winders, Anahi Yañez, Arzu Yorgancioğlu, Osman Yusuf, Jean Bousquet, Nils E Billo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 84 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,825,458
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#76
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,763
of 381,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.