You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2019
Irrum Afzal, Sarkhell Radha, Tomislav Smoljanović, Giles H. Stafford, Roy Twyman, Richard E. Field
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||7||23%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||7%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||3%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||11||37%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||3||10%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
of 1,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 352,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.