You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trained facilitators’ experiences with structured advance care planning conversations in oncology: an international focus group study within the ACTION trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-019-6170-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Zwakman, K. Pollock, F. Bulli, G. Caswell, B. Červ, J. J. M. van Delden, L. Deliens, A. van der Heide, L. J. Jabbarian, H. Koba-Čeh, U. Lunder, G. Miccinesi, C. A. Møller Arnfeldt, J. Seymour, A. Toccafondi, M. N. Verkissen, M. C. Kars |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 55 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,690,772
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,208
of 8,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,430
of 363,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#67
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.