You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Designing the ideal model for assessment of wound contamination after gunshot injuries: a comparative experimental study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Surgery, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2482-12-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Constantin von See, Majeed Rana, Marcus Stoetzer, Horst Kokemueller, Martin Ruecker, Nils-Claudius Gellrich |
Abstract |
Modern high-velocity projectiles produce temporary cavities and can thus cause extensive tissue destruction along the bullet path. It is still unclear whether gelatin blocks, which are used as a well-accepted tissue simulant, allow the effects of projectiles to be adequately investigated and how these effects are influenced by caliber size. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 27% |
Professor | 3 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 7 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 27% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,360,617
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#219
of 1,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,627
of 161,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,316 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.