↓ Skip to main content

Supporting community annotation and user collaboration in the integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supporting community annotation and user collaboration in the integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2629-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

I-Min A. Chen, Victor M. Markowitz, Krishna Palaniappan, Ernest Szeto, Ken Chu, Jinghua Huang, Anna Ratner, Manoj Pillay, Michalis Hadjithomas, Marcel Huntemann, Natalia Mikhailova, Galina Ovchinnikova, Natalia N. Ivanova, Nikos C. Kyrpides

Abstract

The exponential growth of genomic data from next generation technologies renders traditional manual expert curation effort unsustainable. Many genomic systems have included community annotation tools to address the problem. Most of these systems adopted a "Wiki-based" approach to take advantage of existing wiki technologies, but encountered obstacles in issues such as usability, authorship recognition, information reliability and incentive for community participation. Here, we present a different approach, relying on tightly integrated method rather than "Wiki-based" method, to support community annotation and user collaboration in the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system. The IMG approach allows users to use existing IMG data warehouse and analysis tools to add gene, pathway and biosynthetic cluster annotations, to analyze/reorganize contigs, genes and functions using workspace datasets, and to share private user annotations and workspace datasets with collaborators. We show that the annotation effort using IMG can be part of the research process to overcome the user incentive and authorship recognition problems thus fostering collaboration among domain experts. The usability and reliability issues are addressed by the integration of curated information and analysis tools in IMG, together with DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) expert review. By incorporating annotation operations into IMG, we provide an integrated environment for users to perform deeper and extended data analysis and annotation in a single system that can lead to publications and community knowledge sharing as shown in the case studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 5%
United States 2 3%
Switzerland 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 50 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 24%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,477,223
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,515
of 10,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,074
of 300,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#65
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.