You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The paradox of the evidence about invasive fungal infections prevention
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1284-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea Cortegiani, Vincenzo Russotto, Santi Maurizio Raineri, Antonino Giarratano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Belgium | 2 | 7% |
Italy | 2 | 7% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
Scientists | 3 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 26% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 58% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,302,088
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,028
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,437
of 312,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#64
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.