↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of open fractures with a computer-assisted external fixator system without the use of fluoroscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of open fractures with a computer-assisted external fixator system without the use of fluoroscopy
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13018-016-0379-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adnan Kara, Haluk Celik, Ali Seker, Ozgur Karakoyun, Raffi Armagan, Ersin Kuyucu, Mehmet Erdil

Abstract

Developed for the treatment of deformity correction, computer-assisted circular external fixators in recent years have also been used for fracture fixation. In this study, we aimed to present the efficacy of computer-assisted circular external fixator use in open long bone fractures with our new technique. Between February 2013 and June 2014, 14 patients (mean age 24.5 (range 20-32)) with open tibial or femoral open fractures were treated with the computer-assisted fixation system (Spider Frame-Tasarım Medikal, Istanbul, Turkey). In all patients, appropriate positions of the rings and Schanz screws were determined by measurements on preoperative radiographs. The length of the Schanz screws were determined by depth measure marks on drill bits. Obvious deformities were corrected intraoperatively by manipulations, but residual deformities were corrected by a software program (Spiderfix, Tasarım Medikal, Istanbul, Turkey). We did not use fluoroscopy during the procedures. Ten patients had tibia diaphyseal and four patients had femoral diaphyseal fractures. Mean surgical time was 24.2 (range 18-28) min. Average follow-up time was 10.2 (range 9-14) months. Mean time for deformity correction was 3.1 (2-5) days. Complete union was observed in all patients with a mean of 4.9 (range 3-9) months. There were two grade 2 pin site infections treated with oral antibiotherapy and pin site care. We did not detect any Schanz screw breakage, loosening, deep infection, nonunion, or malunion. Computer-assisted external fixation systems can be used in the treatment of open fractures, and they provide the chance for acute or gradual correction. Preoperative planning and assistant devices with depth measures may decrease the procedure time and the need for fluoroscopy use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 22%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 44%
Engineering 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,453,763
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#945
of 1,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,838
of 298,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#31
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,375 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.