You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enabling public, patient and practitioner involvement in co-designing frailty pathways in the acute care setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-019-4626-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deirdre O’Donnell, Éidín Ní Shé, Mary McCarthy, Shirley Thornton, Thelma Doran, Freda Smith, Barry O’Brien, Jim Milton, Bibiana Savin, Anne Donnellan, Eugene Callan, Eilish McAuliffe, Simone Gray, Therese Carey, Nicola Boyle, Michelle O’Brien, Andrew Patton, Jade Bailey, Diarmuid O’Shea, Therese Cooney Marie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 28 | 40% |
| Spain | 7 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 66% |
| Scientists | 18 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 62 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#890,374
of 25,163,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#218
of 8,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,874
of 373,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#10
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.