You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Instrument development, data collection, and characteristics of practices, staff, and measures in the Improving Quality of Care in Diabetes (iQuaD) Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-61 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin P Eccles, Susan Hrisos, Jill J Francis, Elaine Stamp, Marie Johnston, Gillian Hawthorne, Nick Steen, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Marko Elovainio, Justin Presseau, Margaret Hunter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 27% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 11% |
| Psychology | 16 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2012.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,655
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,277
of 127,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.