You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Defining ‘actionable’ high- costhealth care use: results using the Canadian Institute for Health Information population grouping methodology
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12939-019-1074-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maureen Anderson, Crawford W. Revie, Henrik Stryhn, Cordell Neudorf, Yvonne Rosehart, Wenbin Li, Meriç Osman, David L. Buckeridge, Laura C. Rosella, Walter P. Wodchis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 23% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Librarian | 3 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 24 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,308,322
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#621
of 1,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,230
of 361,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#18
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.