↓ Skip to main content

Preventing mood and anxiety disorders in youth: a multi-centre RCT in the high risk offspring of depressed and anxious patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preventing mood and anxiety disorders in youth: a multi-centre RCT in the high risk offspring of depressed and anxious patients
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maaike H Nauta, Helma Festen, Catrien G Reichart, Willem A Nolen, A Dennis Stant, Claudi LH Bockting, Nic JA van der Wee, Aartjan Beekman, Theo AH Doreleijers, Catharina A Hartman, Peter J de Jong, Sybolt O de Vries

Abstract

Anxiety and mood disorders are highly prevalent and pose a huge burden on patients. Their offspring is at increased risk of developing these disorders as well, indicating a clear need for prevention of psychopathology in this group. Given high comorbidity and non-specificity of intergenerational transmission of disorders, prevention programs should target both anxiety and depression. Further, while the indication for preventive interventions is often elevated symptoms, offspring with other high risk profiles may also benefit from resilience-based prevention programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 388 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 14%
Researcher 54 13%
Student > Master 52 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 8%
Other 59 15%
Unknown 106 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 171 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 9%
Social Sciences 23 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 1%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 115 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,179,702
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#767
of 4,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,824
of 161,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.